Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TIAN HUI

IMO: 9774599
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,286 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.8

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (+72%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

8.31

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.6 (−61%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,146 t

CO₂ emitted

12,947 t

Distance sailed

41,962 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,925 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.4 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+131%)

17.4Ranks 2,494 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 9.3 (+32%)

6.9Faster than 92% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 13.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−47%)

10.2Ranks 414 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU51%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

240 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIAN HUI
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIAN HUI
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TIAN HUI
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+4%	−0%	−45%	+105%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+0%	−4%	−15%	+1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.7 kn	−21%	−1%	+13%	−21%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+21%	+12%	+414%	+22%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	+9%	+0%	−88%	+9%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−7%	+4%	−10%	−7%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−13%	−20%	+28%	−14%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	1,808	5,692	22,228	1,806	12.3	81.4	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	3,168	9,934	40,431	3,152	12.8	78.3	–	–
2023	not published	3,713	11,592	47,467	3,538	13.4	78.2	12.4	–
2022	not published	4,146	12,947	41,962	3,925	10.7	98.8	17.9	–
2021	not published	664	2,067	8,157	702	11.6	81.4	7.85	–
2020	not published	4,978	15,507	66,795	5,263	12.7	74.5	13.5	–
2019	not published	5,958	18,565	74,592	6,552	11.4	79.9	13.6	–
2018	not published	5,371	16,849	58,282	4,743	12.3	92.2	15.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	13.6	25.5	−47%	414 of 2,723	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	6.62	19.3	−66%	66 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	6.58	20.7	−68%	52 of 1,045	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	8.31	21.6	−61%	79 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	6.82	22.7	−70%	29 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.25	24.5	−74%	11 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.70	25.0	−73%	10 of 1,154	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	7.79	24.9	−69%	37 of 1,044	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.