Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NORDIC TELLUS

IMO: 9818230
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 69,364 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH · part of Columbia Shipmanagement

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,483 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

132

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (−32%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,824 t

CO₂ emitted

11,959 t

Distance sailed

28,913 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,775 h

116 days, 32% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 129 (−10%)

76.1Ranks 599 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.0Faster than 40% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.25 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−34%)

4.51Ranks 305 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU36%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

2,034 t

53% of all fuel; 47% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,356 t

11.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDIC TELLUS
Oil tanker median

110.0120.0130.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC TELLUS
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC TELLUS
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−3%	+3%	+98%	+5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	−11%	−26%	−51%	−30%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+11%	+15%	+38%	+9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−8%	+0%	+46%	+9%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+13%	+10%	+4%	+26%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	−13%	+2%	+24%	−2%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH	1,223	3,824	10,065	1,047	9.6	122	6.36	48%
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd	6,561	20,621	56,625	5,443	10.4	116	5.25	53%
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	3,406	10,668	28,619	2,917	9.8	119	5.00	56%
2023	not published	7,804	24,459	58,137	4,934	11.8	134	7.19	46%
2022	not published	5,118	16,015	42,230	3,711	11.4	121	6.60	47%
2021	not published	3,824	11,959	28,913	2,775	10.4	132	6.04	53%
2020	not published	3,241	10,390	27,706	2,573	10.8	117	4.80	–
2019	not published	2,998	9,376	22,303	2,424	9.2	134	4.92	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd	5.25	7.95	−34%	305 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	5.00	8.06	−38%	295 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	7.19	8.44	−15%	681 of 1,797	ABS	B
2022	not published	6.60	8.51	−22%	594 of 1,961	ABS	B
2021	not published	6.04	8.86	−32%	410 of 1,789	ABS	B
2020	not published	4.80	9.03	−47%	187 of 1,870	ABS	B
2019	not published	4.92	8.83	−44%	240 of 1,919	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.