Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TIAN YOU

IMO: 9823625
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,723 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.9

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (+32%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

6.38

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (−74%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+32%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,558 t

CO₂ emitted

14,200 t

Distance sailed

60,058 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,696 h

196 days, 54% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.5 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+134%)

17.4Ranks 2,516 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 9.3 (+31%)

6.9Faster than 91% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 9.53 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−63%)

10.2Ranks 229 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU51%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

567 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIAN YOU
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIAN YOU
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TIAN YOU
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+7%	+0%	−51%	+46%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−0%	+2%	−1%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−5%	−7%	+25%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+10%	+17%	−17%	+11%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	−21%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+1%	−2%	−2%	+1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−18%	−18%	+393%	−45%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	1,929	6,051	23,362	1,911	12.2	82.5	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	3,669	11,473	47,376	3,645	13.0	77.4	–	–
2023	not published	3,722	11,687	47,897	3,753	12.8	77.7	12.5	–
2022	not published	3,128	9,791	38,291	2,926	13.1	81.7	11.2	–
2021	not published	3,437	10,727	46,396	3,770	12.3	74.1	13.7	–
2020	not published	4,498	14,081	58,773	4,738	12.4	76.5	13.7	–
2019	not published	4,558	14,200	60,058	4,696	12.8	75.9	13.3	–
2018	not published	1,128	3,513	12,178	956	12.7	92.6	11.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	9.53	25.5	−63%	229 of 2,723	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	6.53	19.3	−66%	60 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	6.58	20.7	−68%	52 of 1,045	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	6.90	21.6	−68%	50 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	6.24	22.7	−73%	18 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.46	24.5	−74%	12 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.38	25.0	−74%	6 of 1,154	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	11.6	72.9	−84%	4 of 87	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.