Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING JIN XIU

IMO: 9872169
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Yangpu China
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.91 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,614 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.5

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

4.07

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (−82%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,807 t

CO₂ emitted

5,669 t

Distance sailed

22,443 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,627 h

68 days, 19% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 92.7 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+163%)

17.4Ranks 2,628 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 9.3 (+30%)

6.9Faster than 90% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 6.12 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−76%)

10.2Ranks 30 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU33%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

52 t

0.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING JIN XIU
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING JIN XIU
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

COSCO SHIPPING JIN XIU
General cargo median

0.010.020.030.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	+17%	+5%	−10%	+54%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.8 kn	−9%	+14%	−71%	−10%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.8 kn	+0%	−21%	−16%	+1%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+8%	+6%	+36%	+7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−10%	−1%	+270%	−10%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	625	1,967	6,747	558	12.1	92.7	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	597	1,861	7,534	558	13.5	79.2	–	–
2023	not published	2,238	7,010	25,681	2,403	10.7	87.2	24.5	–
2022	not published	2,649	8,268	30,532	2,256	13.5	86.8	11.3	–
2021	not published	1,807	5,669	22,443	1,627	13.8	80.5	14.3	–
2020	not published	545	1,702	6,063	485	12.5	89.9	7.59	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	6.12	25.5	−76%	30 of 2,723	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	3.98	19.3	−79%	11 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	4.40	20.7	−79%	17 of 1,045	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	4.37	21.6	−80%	9 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	4.07	22.7	−82%	5 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	4.53	24.5	−82%	6 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.