Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Westfal-Larsen Management ASyour view

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

	Westfal-Larsen Management AS
Ships	12
CO₂ emitted	56 kt
Fuel per mile	92 kg/nm
Average speed	11.6 kn
CO₂ at berth	3.2%
Ships burning LNG	2
Main segment	General cargo

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3

Westfal-Larsen Management AS12.3 (−36% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
Westfal-Larsen Management AS	8	12.3	−36%	88	11.6	1,804	3.2%	–
Segment median		19.3	0%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

Westfal-Larsen Management AS11.2 (−33% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
Westfal-Larsen Management AS	4	11.2	−33%	107	11.7	741	3.1%	2
Segment median		16.7	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
Westfal-Larsen Management AS	DNV (12)	67%	33%	0%	0%

Westfal-Larsen Management AS: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
HOYANGER	9100073	General cargo	28.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	+47%	12.0	5,652 t	€86k
TARANGER	9524762	Chemical tanker	10.9 g CO₂/t·nm	8.6	+26%	11.9	1,318 t	€20k
HERANGER	9079121	General cargo	22.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	+17%	11.9	5,765 t	€88k
LEIKANGERLNG	9725304	Chemical tanker	18.4 g CO₂/t·nm	16.5	+11%	11.9	2,278 t	€35k
FJELLANGER	9387724	Chemical tanker	9.4 g CO₂/t·nm	8.6	+9%	11.3	3,705 t	€61k
LINDANGERLNG	9725299	Chemical tanker	11.5 g CO₂/t·nm	12.0	−4%	11.8	2,520 t	€39k
INDIANA	9186211	General cargo	17.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	−10%	12.5	4,871 t	€74k
ISOLDANA	9186235	General cargo	15.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	−20%	12.2	9,733 t	€159k
POSIDANA	9371086	General cargo	9.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	−51%	11.4	8,103 t	€140k
PROVIDANA	9380788	General cargo	8.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	−56%	10.9	3,717 t	€59k
OPTIMANA	9253856	General cargo	8.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	−58%	10.5	4,217 t	€71k
OKIANA	9253868	General cargo	6.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm	19.3	−66%	10.4	4,188 t	€66k

30 of 12 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.