Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Westfal-Larsen Management
Ships13
CO₂ emitted91 kt+62.1%
Fuel per mile92 kg/nm
Average speed11.8 kn
CO₂ at berth4.1%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Westfal-Larsen Management11.5 (−23%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Westfal-Larsen Management511.5−23%9611.82,7504.4%–
Segment median 15.00%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Westfal-Larsen Management18.3 (−28%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Westfal-Larsen Management818.3−28%8711.81,6403.8%–
Segment median 25.50%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Westfal-Larsen ManagementDNV (13)38%62%62%0%

Westfal-Larsen Management: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
OKIANA9253868General cargo141 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+454%11.82,521 t€61k
POSIDANA9371086General cargo59.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+133%11.82,336 t€65k
FAUSKANGER9387700Chemical tanker21.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+41%11.68,450 t€224k
FJELLANGER9387724Chemical tanker10.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+30%12.612,008 t€373k
FINNANGER9387712Chemical tanker10.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+27%12.68,086 t€221k
FALKANGER9387695Chemical tanker11.8 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+2%10.611,603 t€316k
TARANGER9524762Chemical tanker11.5 g CO₂/t·nm11.50%12.58,639 t€242k
HOYANGER9100073General cargo21.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−17%12.58,176 t€216k
HERANGER9079121General cargo19.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−24%12.310,426 t€270k
PROVIDANA9380788General cargo17.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−33%11.85,593 t€144k
ISOLDANA9186235General cargo12.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−53%10.93,294 t€96k
INDIANA9186211General cargo11.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−54%11.54,216 t€119k
OPTIMANA9253856General cargo9.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−62%10.95,556 t€165k

30 of 13 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.