Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 21 |
| CO₂ emitted | 105 kt−41.4% |
| Fuel per mile | 107 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Vehicle carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.60.3 (+9% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | 20 | 60.3 | +9% | 108 | 14.9 | 1,008 | 2.6% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.4.9 (−38% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | 1 | 4.9 | −38% | 96 | 10.5 | 1,726 | 2.3% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | Korean Register (21) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRAND AURORA | 9279331 | Vehicle carrier | 56.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | +28% | 14.6 | 6,479 t | €144k |
| GRAND SAPPHIRE | 9325233 | Vehicle carrier | 95.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | +25% | 12.2 | 1,424 t | €43k |
| GRAND EAGLE | 9267663 | Vehicle carrier | 93.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | +23% | 12.1 | 799 t | €39k |
| GRAND URANUS | 9472206 | Vehicle carrier | 53.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | +21% | 15.0 | 6,775 t | €225k |
| GRAND NEPTUNE | 9303209 | Vehicle carrier | 66.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +21% | 15.2 | 11,553 t | €403k |
| GRAND RUBY | 9325221 | Vehicle carrier | 61.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +11% | 14.9 | 387 t | €12k |
| GRAND DAHLIA | 9355238 | Vehicle carrier | 60.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +9% | 14.2 | 5,572 t | €208k |
| GRAND ORION | 9303194 | Vehicle carrier | 45.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | +3% | 15.1 | 13,897 t | €351k |
| GRAND PIONEER | 9247572 | Vehicle carrier | 56.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +1% | 15.0 | 5,671 t | €146k |
| FORTUNE KNIGHT | 1051410 | Bulk carrier | 4.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +1% | 10.5 | 5,417 t | €148k |
| GRAND HERO | 9339806 | Vehicle carrier | 43.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | 0% | 15.3 | 7,314 t | €229k |
| GOLD ESTRELLA | 9339844 | Vehicle carrier | 55.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | 0% | 15.6 | 8,012 t | €211k |
| GRAND MARK | 9228306 | Vehicle carrier | 74.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | −2% | 15.5 | 3,615 t | €98k |
| GRAND LEGACY | 9355240 | Vehicle carrier | 42.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | −3% | 15.0 | 11,473 t | €315k |
| GRAND PAVO | 9284776 | Vehicle carrier | 74.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | −3% | 15.9 | 1,614 t | €57k |
| GRAND VICTORY | 9334234 | Vehicle carrier | 53.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | −4% | 15.2 | 5,285 t | €134k |
| DREAM ORCHID | 9360568 | Vehicle carrier | 149 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | −6% | 13.4 | 1,262 t | €55k |
| GRAND COSMO | 9303182 | Vehicle carrier | 143 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | −10% | 14.8 | 717 t | €19k |
| GRAND PHOENIX | 9284764 | Vehicle carrier | 68.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | −10% | 14.3 | 2,937 t | €85k |
| GRAND DOLPHIN | 9279329 | Vehicle carrier | 55.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | −27% | 14.2 | 1,074 t | €29k |
30 of 21 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.