Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- SFLyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| SFL | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 21 |
| CO₂ emitted | 515 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 208 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- SFL8.1 (−54% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | 7 | 8.1 | −54% | 267 | 16.1 | 3,671 | 0.9% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- SFL5.4 (−33% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | 12 | 5.4 | −33% | 148 | 11.1 | 2,628 | 5.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- SFL7.2 (−11% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | 2 | 7.2 | −11% | 96 | 10.1 | 1,442 | 2.9% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | DNV (21) | 71% | 29% | 48% | 0% |
SFL: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL THELON | 9593000 | Oil tanker | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +34% | 10.4 | 21,618 t | €372k |
| ATLANTA EXPRESS | 9667162 | Container | 8.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +23% | 17.0 | 47,786 t | €0 |
| SFL LION | 9664770 | Oil tanker | 5.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +23% | 8.9 | 7,493 t | €112k |
| SFL TIGER | 9664809 | Oil tanker | 5.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +21% | 11.6 | 21,903 t | €352k |
| SFL PUMA | 9664794 | Oil tanker | 5.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +16% | 11.7 | 12,154 t | €188k |
| SFL OTTAWA | 9593012 | Oil tanker | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +13% | 10.8 | 21,576 t | €343k |
| CAP SAN VINCENT | 9717228 | Container | 7.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +12% | 16.1 | 77,390 t | €1.3m |
| CAP SAN JUAN | 9717204 | Container | 7.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +11% | 16.1 | 53,899 t | €877k |
| SFL KATE | 9615676 | Bulk carrier | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | +11% | 10.2 | 4,630 t | €79k |
| SFL PANTHER | 9664782 | Oil tanker | 5.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +11% | 12.3 | 8,672 t | €140k |
| SFL FRASER | 9874258 | Oil tanker | 10.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +6% | 12.3 | 6,451 t | €101k |
| CAP SAN LAZARO | 9717216 | Container | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +5% | 15.4 | 80,686 t | €1.3m |
| SFL SARA | 9539834 | Bulk carrier | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | +4% | 10.0 | 4,148 t | €68k |
| MARLIN SICILY | 9835848 | Oil tanker | 4.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +4% | 11.9 | 17,012 t | €269k |
| MARLIN SANTORINI | 9835836 | Oil tanker | 4.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −1% | 11.8 | 16,088 t | €259k |
| SFL ALBANY | 9874246 | Oil tanker | 4.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −4% | 11.6 | 11,942 t | €200k |
| MARLIN SHIKOKU | 9841627 | Oil tanker | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −6% | 7.8 | 7,810 t | €130k |
| OAKLAND EXPRESS | 9667174 | Container | 9.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | −11% | 16.5 | 21,283 t | €0 |
| SFL TAURUS | 9978339 | Oil tanker | 5.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −15% | 11.7 | 8,977 t | €147k |
| HOUSTON EXPRESS | 9667150 | Container | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | −20% | 16.7 | 29,644 t | €0 |
| SAN FERNANDO | 9698642 | Container | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | −25% | 16.0 | 33,520 t | €504k |
30 of 21 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.