Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Ershipyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Ership | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 31 kt−9.7% |
| Fuel per mile | 70 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 9.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Ership21.2 (+169% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ership | 4 | 21.2 | +169% | 72 | 9.7 | 2,784 | 9.5% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- Ership28.4 (+12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ership | 1 | 28.4 | +12% | 64 | 9.8 | 3,181 | 10.7% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ership | DNV (5) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Ership: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DON JUAN | 9394222 | Bulk carrier | 24.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +56% | 10.5 | 6,704 t | €130k |
| SOUSELAS | 9394234 | Bulk carrier | 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +45% | 9.2 | 6,502 t | €127k |
| ELENA | 9501215 | Bulk carrier | 19.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +28% | 8.8 | 5,081 t | €170k |
| RUMA | 9652387 | Bulk carrier | 18.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +17% | 10.3 | 6,068 t | €125k |
| DOMINICA | 9232204 | General cargo | 28.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +12% | 9.8 | 6,223 t | €176k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.