Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Golden Union Shipping Co SA
Ships26
CO₂ emitted109 kt
Fuel per mile120 kg/nm
Average speed10.3 kn
CO₂ at berth3.5%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentBulk carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Golden Union Shipping Co SA7.1 (−11%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Golden Union Shipping Co SA267.1−11%12010.31,5943.5%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Golden Union Shipping Co SALloyd's Register (26)100%0%0%0%

Golden Union Shipping Co SA: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
MAIRINI9474670Bulk carrier208 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+1238%10.31,446 t€43k
CAPE ELEKTRA9527922Bulk carrier10.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+125%9.04,659 t€161k
CIC ROLACO9567116Bulk carrier7.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+50%9.36,558 t€175k
ELENA VE9453066Bulk carrier13.0 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+38%10.86,928 t€191k
SEATTLE SLEW9573737Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+30%8.23,112 t€85k
GU PRIDE9477220Bulk carrier8.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+28%7.01,298 t€0
PATRICIA V9453054Bulk carrier10.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+27%10.814,438 t€453k
GIORGIS9619775Bulk carrier8.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+26%10.35,182 t€147k
SEABISCUIT9619787Bulk carrier11.3 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+19%10.75,798 t€166k
FLAG EVI9619799Bulk carrier5.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+13%10.65,874 t€161k
MALENA9852822Bulk carrier7.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+7%12.24,874 t€135k
PHAR LAP9590694Bulk carrier5.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+5%9.93,800 t€105k
FLAG MARINA9384928Bulk carrier4.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+1%10.88,965 t€238k
CAPETAN IOANNIS9589695Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−2%10.411,532 t€308k
NIKOLAS D9474723Bulk carrier6.2 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−5%10.73,846 t€139k
CIC PAOLA9692820Bulk carrier3.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−24%9.48,142 t€222k
SECRETARIAT9699701Bulk carrier3.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−35%9.88,947 t€264k

30 of 26 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.