Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Cape Shipping SAyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Cape Shipping SA | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 64 kt−21.6% |
| Fuel per mile | 114 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.4 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Cape Shipping SA20.3 (+24% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cape Shipping SA | 4 | 20.3 | +24% | 115 | 12.4 | 4,436 | 2.5% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Cape Shipping SA3.8 (−52% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cape Shipping SA | 1 | 3.8 | −52% | 95 | 11.2 | 289 | 0.0% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cape Shipping SA | DNV (5) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Cape Shipping SA: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPE CITIUS | 9848742 | Container | 22.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +3% | 10.1 | 14,741 t | €497k |
| CAPE ALTIUS | 9848730 | Container | 20.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −9% | 13.1 | 21,195 t | €609k |
| CAPE CORFU | 9857432 | Container | 20.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −10% | 13.8 | 23,250 t | €634k |
| CAPE KASOS | 9627069 | Bulk carrier | 3.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −22% | 11.2 | 963 t | €25k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.