Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Eurotankers Incyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Eurotankers Inc | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 10 kt−62.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 119 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Eurotankers Inc5.9 (−26% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurotankers Inc | 4 | 5.9 | −26% | 119 | 9.2 | 766 | 2.7% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Eurotankers Inc9.4 (+20% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurotankers Inc | 1 | 9.4 | +20% | 91 | 11.0 | 14 | 0.0% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurotankers Inc | ICS Verification Services (5) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Eurotankers Inc: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUROSTAR | 9546203 | Bulk carrier | 9.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +19% | 11.0 | 44 t | €1k |
| EUROINTEGRITY | 9410648 | Oil tanker | 5.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −6% | 7.3 | 4,144 t | €111k |
| SIREN | 9405423 | Oil tanker | 5.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −20% | 11.7 | 3,129 t | €83k |
| NOSTOS | 9258014 | Oil tanker | 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | −56% | 11.5 | 613 t | €18k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.