Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Medcare Shipping SAyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Medcare Shipping SA | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 39 kt+2.6% |
| Fuel per mile | 102 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 12.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Medcare Shipping SA18.3 (+22% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medcare Shipping SA | 3 | 18.3 | +22% | 106 | 10.3 | 3,509 | 12.8% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Medcare Shipping SA6.3 (−20% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medcare Shipping SA | 2 | 6.3 | −20% | 77 | 11.7 | 1,164 | 3.6% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medcare Shipping SA | ICS Verification Services (5) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Medcare Shipping SA: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARVEA | 9301897 | Chemical tanker | 25.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +67% | 10.2 | 13,231 t | €546k |
| LIBERA | 9293973 | Chemical tanker | 18.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +20% | 9.9 | 9,204 t | €308k |
| SERENA M | 9444508 | Chemical tanker | 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | +6% | 10.7 | 13,749 t | €468k |
| ERTEA | 9546198 | Bulk carrier | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −4% | 11.7 | 3,304 t | €95k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.