Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited
Ships28
CO₂ emitted159 kt+56.8%
Fuel per mile106 kg/nm
Average speed11.3 kn
CO₂ at berth4.5%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentBulk carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited7.1 (−10%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited197.1−10%10911.11,3083.5%–
Segment median 7.90%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited6.8 (−15%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited56.8−15%11711.13,0505.8%–
Segment median 8.00%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited9.3 (−63%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited49.3−63%7812.41,6845.9%–
Segment median 25.50%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) LimitedBureau Veritas (28)100%0%0%0%

Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
CS CHENGDU9928231Bulk carrier84.2 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+443%11.83,340 t€88k
CL HEIDI9720952Bulk carrier14.9 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+57%8.9739 t€0
CSSC AMSTERDAM9853890Bulk carrier7.4 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+54%11.35,232 t€150k
JY LAKE9845257Bulk carrier13.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+42%11.311,920 t€327k
CSSC ROTTERDAM9853905Bulk carrier6.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+40%11.63,221 t€86k
BBG BRIGHT9598177Bulk carrier9.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+39%11.12,995 t€83k
BRIGHT VENTURE9868883Bulk carrier10.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+31%11.03,577 t€97k
GREAT VOYAGE9909106Bulk carrier11.5 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+21%10.51,803 t€49k
CL BEIJING9649299Bulk carrier5.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+19%11.05,778 t€153k
BBG NOVA9705342Bulk carrier7.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+16%12.41,482 t€39k
UNITY VENTURE9773739Oil tanker6.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+4%11.39,261 t€272k
LIGHT VENTURE9868895Bulk carrier8.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+3%11.64,268 t€121k
CS NAN JING9874698Bulk carrier4.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+1%9.83,129 t€86k
CHAILEASE BRIGHT9642485Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.80%10.77,540 t€202k
CS HANG ZHOU9874703Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−1%10.23,836 t€105k
WISDOM VENTURE9773741Oil tanker5.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−6%10.98,169 t€235k
CSSC GLADSTONE9853917Bulk carrier4.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−6%11.86,154 t€167k
VICTORY VENTURE9773040Oil tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−13%10.717,325 t€470k
TENACITY VENTURE9773052Oil tanker7.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−15%11.615,286 t€427k
CSSC IMMINGHAM9853929Bulk carrier4.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−18%10.05,857 t€155k
CS JI NAN9874686Bulk carrier3.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−23%11.212,923 t€377k
CS WU HAN9874715Bulk carrier3.6 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−25%11.55,205 t€188k
TAI FU9998080General cargo11.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−57%11.61,391 t€53k
HONG FU9998078General cargo9.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−63%13.23,145 t€85k
JIN FU9998054General cargo9.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−64%12.410,700 t€315k
WANG FU9998066General cargo6.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−75%12.05,178 t€151k

30 of 28 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.