Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Princess Cruise Lines Ltd
Ships12
CO₂ emitted325 kt+7.9%
Fuel per mile374 kg/nm
Average speed15.0 kn
CO₂ at berth11.5%
Ships burning LNG2
Main segmentCruise

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Cruise

CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 521

  • Princess Cruise Lines Ltd369 (−29%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Princess Cruise Lines Ltd12369−29%37415.01,56311.5%2
Segment median 5210%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Princess Cruise Lines LtdDNV (12)100%0%100%0%

Princess Cruise Lines Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
CORAL PRINCESS9229659Cruise643 g CO₂/pax·nm521+24%10.31,120 t€34k
ISLAND PRINCESS9230402Cruise528 g CO₂/pax·nm521+1%15.012,448 t€453k
CARIBBEAN PRINCESS9215490Cruise451 g CO₂/pax·nm521−13%11.4423 t€13k
GRAND PRINCESS9104005Cruise439 g CO₂/pax·nm521−16%12.6444 t€13k
CROWN PRINCESS9293399Cruise393 g CO₂/pax·nm521−24%16.313,110 t€491k
EMERALD PRINCESS9333151Cruise385 g CO₂/pax·nm521−26%15.555,546 t€2.2m
REGAL PRINCESS9584724Cruise354 g CO₂/pax·nm521−32%13.632,757 t€1.1m
MAJESTIC PRINCESS9614141Cruise350 g CO₂/pax·nm521−33%14.042,819 t€1.8m
STAR PRINCESSLNG9863120Cruise331 g CO₂/pax·nm521−36%14.510,568 t€367k
ENCHANTED PRINCESS9807126Cruise326 g CO₂/pax·nm521−37%12.23,302 t€99k
SKY PRINCESS9802396Cruise309 g CO₂/pax·nm521−41%15.984,275 t€3.1m
SUN PRINCESSLNG9863118Cruise263 g CO₂/pax·nm521−49%15.268,123 t€2.7m

30 of 12 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.