Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Transpetrol TM AS
Ships9
CO₂ emitted84 kt+56.4%
Fuel per mile111 kg/nm
Average speed11.7 kn
CO₂ at berth5.9%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Transpetrol TM AS8.8 (+10%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Transpetrol TM AS68.8+10%12011.72,0735.8%–
Segment median 8.00%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • Transpetrol TM AS15.2 (−57%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Transpetrol TM AS115.2−57%10812.93,2083.5%–
Segment median 35.60%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Transpetrol TM AS9.2 (−39%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Transpetrol TM AS29.2−39%9110.71,8739.4%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Transpetrol TM ASDNV (9)0%30%100%0%

Transpetrol TM AS: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
TP AFFINITY9645401Oil tanker7.5 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+20%11.713,129 t€368k
TP VENTURE9895202Chemical tanker9.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+12%10.710,316 t€363k
TP ENDEAVOUR9835056Chemical tanker9.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+12%11.01,318 t€38k
TP PERSEVERANCE9730139Gas carrier (LPG)15.2 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+6%12.913,980 t€380k
TP SPIRIT9645413Oil tanker8.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+1%11.823,486 t€658k
LUCTOR9479840Oil tanker9.2 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−11%11.32,590 t€77k
TURMOIL9479838Oil tanker8.8 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−15%12.04,116 t€121k
TP ENDURANCE9895197Oil tanker8.8 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−16%10.22,060 t€76k

30 of 10 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.