Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- TRITON NAVIGATION B.V.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| TRITON NAVIGATION B.V. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 8 |
| CO₂ emitted | 20 kt+66.0% |
| Fuel per mile | 98 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Vehicle carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- TRITON NAVIGATION B.V.41.9 (−24% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRITON NAVIGATION B.V. | 2 | 41.9 | −24% | 102 | 15.2 | 1,415 | 1.8% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- TRITON NAVIGATION B.V.5.0 (−37% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRITON NAVIGATION B.V. | 1 | 5.0 | −37% | 98 | 12.1 | 1,479 | 6.3% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- TRITON NAVIGATION B.V.7.8 (−2% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRITON NAVIGATION B.V. | 5 | 7.8 | −2% | 71 | 10.2 | 637 | 6.7% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
TRITON NAVIGATION B.V.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRITON LEADER | 9553103 | Vehicle carrier | 42.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | −3% | 15.2 | 8,015 t | €189k |
| GEMINI LEADER | 9519121 | Vehicle carrier | 41.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | −5% | 15.2 | 5,501 t | €120k |
| AMSTEL TIGER | 9434515 | Bulk carrier | 7.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −18% | 10.2 | 1,453 t | €41k |
| SUNDA | 9806146 | Oil tanker | 5.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −20% | 12.1 | 5,522 t | €161k |
30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.