Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Millenia Maritime Incyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Millenia Maritime Inc | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 6 |
| CO₂ emitted | 44 kt−23.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 105 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 13.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Millenia Maritime Inc18.7 (+24% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millenia Maritime Inc | 6 | 18.7 | +24% | 105 | 11.3 | 2,350 | 13.5% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millenia Maritime Inc | RINA (6) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Millenia Maritime Inc: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARIA M | 9301885 | Chemical tanker | 21.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +39% | 11.3 | 10,952 t | €512k |
| MAGNIFICA | 9374234 | Chemical tanker | 18.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +23% | 11.4 | 12,177 t | €552k |
| FUTURA | 9293961 | Chemical tanker | 17.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +15% | 10.2 | 8,584 t | €276k |
| METEORA | 9322944 | Chemical tanker | 22.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +5% | 11.7 | 8,161 t | €326k |
| FANTASIA | 9378371 | Chemical tanker | 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +3% | 12.6 | 4,372 t | €127k |
30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.