Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 3 |
| CO₂ emitted | 7,677 t−69.8% |
| Fuel per mile | 64 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd.8.7 (+10% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd. | 2 | 8.7 | +10% | 75 | 11.5 | 1,099 | 3.4% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd.17.6 (+17% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd. | 1 | 17.6 | +17% | 43 | 11.8 | 1,080 | 2.9% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd. | Bureau Veritas (3) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Maple Leaf Shipping Co., Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPLE AMBITION | 9760354 | Bulk carrier | 10.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +15% | 11.6 | 1,910 t | €57k |
| MAPLE OCEAN | 1043011 | Chemical tanker | 17.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | −18% | 11.8 | 1,711 t | €48k |
| MAPLE WELL | 9993834 | Bulk carrier | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −19% | 11.5 | 4,056 t | €111k |
30 of 3 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.