Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Prime Tanker Management Incyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Prime Tanker Management Inc | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 9 |
| CO₂ emitted | 41 kt+50.8% |
| Fuel per mile | 114 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 8.2% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Prime Tanker Management Inc9.2 (+16% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prime Tanker Management Inc | 7 | 9.2 | +16% | 134 | 11.6 | 1,145 | 8.2% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Prime Tanker Management Inc8.1 (−46% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prime Tanker Management Inc | 2 | 8.1 | −46% | 86 | 12.1 | 1,928 | 8.1% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prime Tanker Management Inc | ABS (9) | 0% | 78% | 78% | 0% |
Prime Tanker Management Inc: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAGSHIP ORCHID | 9456939 | Oil tanker | 14.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +40% | 9.2 | 1,668 t | €46k |
| FLAGSHIP SAGE | 9471329 | Oil tanker | 13.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +31% | 12.9 | 8,241 t | €226k |
| RS TARA | 9765354 | Oil tanker | 9.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +12% | 10.6 | 10,724 t | €312k |
| CAPE ANDIAMO | 9995428 | Chemical tanker | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +4% | 11.3 | 6,541 t | €212k |
| FLAGSHIP TULIP | 9594896 | Oil tanker | 8.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −2% | 12.5 | 4,138 t | €130k |
| CAPE AVANTI | 9995430 | Chemical tanker | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −6% | 12.9 | 6,050 t | €200k |
| CAPE ANTIBES | 1054632 | Oil tanker | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −23% | 12.0 | 3,149 t | €88k |
30 of 9 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.