Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Minerva Dry Incyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Minerva Dry Inc | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 37 kt+125.4% |
| Fuel per mile | 92 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Minerva Dry Inc22.1 (+36% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minerva Dry Inc | 3 | 22.1 | +36% | 74 | 12.0 | 2,426 | 4.5% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Minerva Dry Inc5.3 (−33% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minerva Dry Inc | 2 | 5.3 | −33% | 130 | 9.8 | 2,119 | 2.1% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minerva Dry Inc | ABS (5) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Minerva Dry Inc: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITTLE EMMA | 9980356 | Container | 23.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +7% | 11.5 | 12,364 t | €533k |
| DOUKATO | 9840659 | Bulk carrier | 7.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +7% | 10.9 | 4,888 t | €136k |
| MONEMVASIA | 9455686 | Bulk carrier | 3.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −25% | 9.0 | 11,882 t | €313k |
| LITTLE ATHINA | 9980368 | Container | 22.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | −51% | 12.8 | 7,185 t | €333k |
| LITTLE MERMAID | 9946245 | Container | 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −52% | 12.4 | 731 t | €19k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.