Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

GoTa Ship Management AB
Ships15
CO₂ emitted43 kt
Fuel per mile26 kg/nm
Average speed9.0 kn
CO₂ at berth9.7%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentGeneral cargo

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • GoTa Ship Management AB27.2 (+7%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
GoTa Ship Management AB1527.2+7%269.03,9059.7%–
Segment median 25.50%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
GoTa Ship Management ABDNV (15)0%73%27%0%

GoTa Ship Management AB: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
SONORO9199397General cargo47.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+85%10.04,710 t€247k
OPTIMAR9199402General cargo42.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+67%9.43,527 t€185k
BIOMAR9956276General cargo41.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+63%8.91,979 t€94k
DELAMAR9528500General cargo31.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+23%9.22,881 t€134k
TERRAMAR9951874General cargo30.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+21%9.12,453 t€113k
REYMAR9552032General cargo28.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+12%9.23,201 t€157k
CALAMAR9528512General cargo28.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+10%9.22,859 t€138k
AQUAMAR9951850General cargo26.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+4%8.83,298 t€158k
ECOMAR9951848General cargo26.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+3%8.32,668 t€138k
STELLAMAR9951836General cargo25.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.50%8.93,296 t€164k
MIRAMAR9552044General cargo24.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−4%9.23,614 t€164k
MAXIMAR9951862General cargo24.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−5%9.02,580 t€126k
ELECTRAMAR9951824General cargo20.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−19%8.43,395 t€167k
VENTUMAR9956288General cargo18.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−27%9.51,135 t€31k

30 of 15 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.