Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- "UMM" LLCyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| "UMM" LLC | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 4 |
| CO₂ emitted | 44 kt+1.2% |
| Fuel per mile | 81 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Ro-pax |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 567
- "UMM" LLC1,545 (+173% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 253
- "UMM" LLC172 (−32% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "UMM" LLC | 4 | 1,545 172 freight | +173% −32% freight | 81 | 11.8 | 3,866 | 7.1% | – |
| Segment median | 567 253 freight | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "UMM" LLC | Verifavia (4) | 0% | 25% | 100% | 0% |
"UMM" LLC: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAPOLI | 9108568 | Ro-pax | 13,019 g CO₂/pax·nm 752 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +2198% +197% | 12.4 | 12,856 t | €381k |
| GOTHICA | 7826867 | Ro-pax | 1,545 g CO₂/pax·nm 172 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +173% −32% | 11.5 | 5,712 t | €167k |
| VILNIUS | 8311900 | Ro-pax | 995 g CO₂/pax·nm 127 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +76% −50% | 11.5 | 16,080 t | €445k |
30 of 4 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.