Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MISUGA SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| MISUGA SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 28 kt+57.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 67 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.4 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- MISUGA SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.6.7 (−16% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISUGA SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD. | 7 | 6.7 | −16% | 67 | 10.4 | 1,826 | 4.3% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
MISUGA SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARKET PORTER | 9852913 | Bulk carrier | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −5% | 7.5 | 2,064 t | €65k |
| TWIN DELIGHT | 9984481 | Bulk carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −14% | 10.8 | 2,244 t | €16k |
| LOWLANDS FIDELITY | 9966087 | Bulk carrier | 5.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −15% | 9.7 | 4,365 t | €142k |
| CATHERINE | 9975193 | Bulk carrier | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −16% | 10.8 | 4,448 t | €143k |
| HANDY INCLUSIVITY | 9951800 | Bulk carrier | 7.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −18% | 11.2 | 4,057 t | €128k |
| BRILLIANT KNIGHT | 9878149 | Bulk carrier | 5.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −23% | 11.1 | 5,038 t | €135k |
| ROMY | 9890862 | Bulk carrier | 7.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −26% | 10.9 | 6,009 t | €171k |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.