Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

UNIMOR SHIPPING AGENCY VARNA LTD
Ships18
CO₂ emitted48 kt+43.3%
Fuel per mile70 kg/nm
Average speed11.0 kn
CO₂ at berth4.6%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentBulk carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • UNIMOR SHIPPING AGENCY VARNA LTD6.4 (−19%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
UNIMOR SHIPPING AGENCY VARNA LTD116.4−19%9110.71,2694.7%–
Segment median 7.90%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • UNIMOR SHIPPING AGENCY VARNA LTD41.8 (+64%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
UNIMOR SHIPPING AGENCY VARNA LTD441.8+64%5011.01,6655.5%–
Segment median 25.50%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
UNIMOR SHIPPING AGENCY VARNA LTDVerifavia (18)100%0%0%0%

UNIMOR SHIPPING AGENCY VARNA LTD: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
TITUS9195470General cargo59.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+132%9.11,652 t€0
GALA9304461General cargo57.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+126%12.84,423 t€139k
ARNICA9514418Bulk carrier8.2 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+25%5.81,217 t€0
ALICIA9663623Bulk carrier7.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+16%10.54,175 t€134k
ARAGONA9729556Bulk carrier8.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+9%11.72,446 t€71k
BBC MINNESOTA9260378General cargo26.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+2%11.84,310 t€132k
ARCOLA9932361Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−2%10.55,353 t€156k
ASTORIA9663635Bulk carrier6.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−3%10.85,949 t€169k
AROSA9420265Bulk carrier6.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−3%11.11,985 t€62k
ARMERIA1041245Bulk carrier6.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−8%11.96,116 t€193k
ARALIA9357212Other77.4 g CO₂/t·nm91.1−15%12.42,363 t€75k
ANNAMARIA9488633General cargo17.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−32%9.21,195 t€33k
OLIVIA9467005Other35.5 g CO₂/t·nm54.9−35%11.42,977 t€98k
OCEAN7 ALGORA9437311Other86.1 g CO₂/t·nm178−51%11.93,684 t€99k

30 of 18 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.