Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 2 |
| CO₂ emitted | 23 kt−79.9% |
| Fuel per mile | 231 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 1 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.11.5 (+62% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. | 1 | 11.5 | +62% | 346 | 14.4 | 1,221 | 2.1% | 1 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.23.1 (−35% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. | 1 | 23.1 | −35% | 111 | 13.2 | 1,275 | 2.3% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. | ClassNK (2) | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL RAYYANLNG | 9086734 | LNG carrier | 11.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +62% | 14.4 | 17,621 t | €472k |
| GALAXY RIVER | 9670016 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 23.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 20.9 | +10% | 13.2 | 5,842 t | €157k |
30 of 2 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.