Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Kyra Global Marine Services
Ships12
CO₂ emitted51 kt+25.5%
Fuel per mile94 kg/nm
Average speed10.0 kn
CO₂ at berth3.1%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentBulk carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Kyra Global Marine Services9.5 (+21%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Kyra Global Marine Services129.5+21%9410.01,4453.1%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Kyra Global Marine ServicesABS (12)100%0%0%0%

Kyra Global Marine Services: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
LILA NANGLI9596337Bulk carrier6.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+26%7.91,362 t€36k
LILA MUNDRA9441881Bulk carrier11.3 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+19%9.14,349 t€136k
LILA INCHEON9571272Bulk carrier11.2 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+18%9.31,984 t€53k
LILA CUMBERLAND9666649Bulk carrier10.9 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+15%11.53,044 t€104k
LILA FROSTBURG9672507Bulk carrier9.9 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+4%11.13,690 t€107k
LILA NOLA9621041Bulk carrier9.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+3%10.53,219 t€103k
LILA TOCHIGI9683116Bulk carrier9.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−1%10.71,154 t€35k
LILA II9498315Bulk carrier9.3 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−2%10.03,960 t€124k
LILA HOUSTON9559676Bulk carrier8.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−11%9.35,008 t€144k
LILA LESVOS9345764Bulk carrier3.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−33%8.54,732 t€61k
LILA SYDNEY9660035Bulk carrier10.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.5−33%10.94,545 t€123k
LILA GONDPUR9596325Bulk carrier3.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−37%10.213,973 t€395k

30 of 12 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.