Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Garland Shipping Services LLC
Ships15
CO₂ emitted34 kt+45.0%
Fuel per mile98 kg/nm
Average speed10.5 kn
CO₂ at berth3.2%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentBulk carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Garland Shipping Services LLC11.4 (+45%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Garland Shipping Services LLC1511.4+45%9810.58193.2%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Garland Shipping Services LLCICS Verification Services (15)100%0%0%0%

Garland Shipping Services LLC: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
JOLLY DANUBE9471240Bulk carrier342 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+2105%11.03,907 t€115k
TELERIG9452854Bulk carrier15.1 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+59%11.12,255 t€61k
BREADFAN9626936Bulk carrier14.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+56%8.91,895 t€52k
KUBRAT9621405Bulk carrier10.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+51%10.01,799 t€48k
MALAMIR9555151Bulk carrier11.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+43%9.94,483 t€136k
WHIPLASH9629249Bulk carrier12.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+31%9.73,483 t€93k
BLUE SPIRIT9471252Bulk carrier9.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+23%11.52,876 t€77k
OMURTAG9605839Bulk carrier9.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+22%9.62,595 t€69k
EIHWAZ9729544Bulk carrier11.2 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+18%11.71,985 t€55k
KOTRAG9503287Bulk carrier7.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+18%10.21,826 t€60k
ASPARUKH9488578Bulk carrier17.0 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+10%10.42,769 t€73k
TERVEL9638927Bulk carrier15.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.5−1%11.42,524 t€71k
KARDAM9474668Bulk carrier7.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−6%10.91,921 t€57k

30 of 15 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.