Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

MMS CO., LTD.
Ships29
CO₂ emitted141 kt
Fuel per mile93 kg/nm
Average speed11.6 kn
CO₂ at berth4.1%
Ships burning LNG2
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • MMS CO., LTD.7.5 (−7%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.177.5−7%9711.21,7825.2%2
Segment median 8.10%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • MMS CO., LTD.7.6 (−7%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.67.6−7%7010.81,2812.2%–
Segment median 8.10%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3

  • MMS CO., LTD.61.2 (+11%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.261.2+11%10316.81,5241.3%–
Segment median 55.30%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8

  • MMS CO., LTD.17.4 (−51%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.117.4−51%11612.61,5872.6%–
Segment median 35.80%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • MMS CO., LTD.13.9 (−17%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.313.9−17%6512.07782.4%–
Segment median 16.70%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MMS CO., LTD.DNV (27), ClassNK (2)93%14%7%0%

MMS CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
GINGA KITE9228291Chemical tanker85.2 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+107%10.4763 t€13k
BW TOKYO9398307Gas carrier (LPG)17.4 g CO₂/t·nm15.0+16%12.67,304 t€114k
NORD TOPAZ9992268Bulk carrier10.0 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+2%9.32,653 t€42k
LOWLANDS DIAMOND9965617Bulk carrier9.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.7−2%11.33,157 t€54k
ANDEAN SUNLNG9911525Oil tanker9.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−3%11.311,890 t€209k
PROGRESS ACE9267687Vehicle carrier53.4 g CO₂/t·nm55.3−4%16.69,905 t€158k
ESTEEM DISCOVERY9882358Oil tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−5%11.94,755 t€86k
PARADISE ACE9293648Vehicle carrier69.0 g CO₂/t·nm73.3−6%17.26,533 t€113k
HAFNIA SHANGHAI9830290Oil tanker8.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−12%10.67,194 t€117k
GINGA MERLIN9254252Chemical tanker13.9 g CO₂/t·nm16.5−16%12.22,606 t€40k
PAVO BRAVE9894480Bulk carrier5.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.7−16%12.04,569 t€76k
GINGA HAWK9222651Chemical tanker13.7 g CO₂/t·nm16.5−17%12.52,401 t€43k
ARIES KARIN9894478Bulk carrier4.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.9−17%10.01,793 t€28k
SOLAR CLAIRE9882425Oil tanker8.0 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−20%11.25,038 t€91k
ESTEEM ENERGY9882346Oil tanker7.9 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−20%10.02,902 t€48k
ESTEEM EXPLORER9855484Oil tanker3.6 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−20%10.316,404 t€266k
HARRISBURG9859210Oil tanker7.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−21%11.36,905 t€118k
ESTEEM COWBOY9952074Oil tanker4.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−22%12.05,577 t€87k
SOLAR MELISSA9882401Oil tanker7.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−23%11.22,826 t€46k
HAFNIA NORDICA9426283Oil tanker7.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−25%12.9265 t€4k
SOLAR KATHERINE9882396Oil tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−27%10.54,164 t€73k
HAFNIA NANJING9863235Oil tanker6.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.4−28%10.51,663 t€26k
SOLAR MADELEIN9882413Oil tanker7.1 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−29%11.05,791 t€105k
ORIENT INNOVATION9793387Oil tanker6.9 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−30%11.86,940 t€118k
ST. CLEMENS9790361Oil tanker6.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−33%11.65,159 t€94k
BAYOU SUNLNG9911537Oil tanker10.7 g CO₂/t·nm25.2−58%12.32,493 t€39k

30 of 29 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.