Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

MMS CO., LTD.
Ships28
CO₂ emitted149 kt+6.0%
Fuel per mile95 kg/nm
Average speed10.9 kn
CO₂ at berth5.6%
Ships burning LNG2
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • MMS CO., LTD.7.1 (−10%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.137.1−10%10310.11,7567.1%1
Segment median 8.00%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • MMS CO., LTD.6.8 (−14%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.106.8−14%7110.61,3054.2%–
Segment median 7.90%

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1

  • MMS CO., LTD.4.9 (−31%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.14.9−31%18214.92,9682.4%1
Segment median 7.10%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • MMS CO., LTD.15.0 (−1%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.215.0−1%5811.33,1946.5%–
Segment median 15.00%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • MMS CO., LTD.15.4 (−57%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.115.4−57%12414.61,4544.2%–
Segment median 35.60%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4

  • MMS CO., LTD.79.2 (+43%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS CO., LTD.179.2+43%1009.523612.1%–
Segment median 55.40%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MMS CO., LTD.DNV (24), ClassNK (4)79%36%14%0%

MMS CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
ESTEEM ASTRO9838008Oil tanker5.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+27%7.220,050 t€573k
HAFNIA NANJING9863235Oil tanker12.7 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+22%7.8612 t€19k
LOWLANDS DIAMOND9965617Bulk carrier10.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+9%8.9437 t€13k
RED ADMIRAL9903140Gas carrier (LPG)15.4 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+7%14.68,179 t€226k
PARADISE ACE9293648Vehicle carrier79.2 g CO₂/t·nm76.1+4%9.5711 t€27k
HAFNIA SHENZHEN9863223Oil tanker8.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+1%8.82,796 t€77k
ARIES KARIN9894478Bulk carrier7.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−4%11.04,636 t€152k
SCARLET ROSELLA9609627Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−4%10.84,111 t€115k
SOLAR KATHERINE9882396Oil tanker9.1 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−12%11.97,011 t€278k
STARDOM WAVE9767467Bulk carrier4.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−14%10.81,920 t€52k
TAKAO GALAXY9920069Chemical tanker13.1 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−14%12.24,101 t€0
BUNUN BENEFIT9747144Bulk carrier8.1 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−14%9.67,656 t€231k
BUNUN VICTORY9949699Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−21%11.31,012 t€28k
ESTEEM SANGO9900461Chemical tanker16.9 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−21%11.08,966 t€209k
NORD TOPAZ9992268Bulk carrier7.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−22%10.95,008 t€154k
BUNUN POWER9782663Bulk carrier7.3 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−23%10.62,181 t€61k
SOLAR MELISSA9882401Oil tanker7.9 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−24%11.25,762 t€197k
SOUTHERN STAR9344071Bulk carrier5.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−24%10.7418 t€11k
SOLAR CLAIRE9882425Oil tanker7.8 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−25%10.94,183 t€125k
ST. CLEMENS9790361Oil tanker7.7 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−26%10.77,011 t€236k
MARVEL KITELNG9760782LNG carrier4.9 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−31%14.921,910 t€589k
PEACE VICTORIA9771028Oil tanker5.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−32%11.56,309 t€191k
YOKOSUKA SPIRIT9932402Oil tanker5.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−32%10.55,661 t€156k
VITALITY DIVA9951903Bulk carrier4.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−33%11.53,462 t€103k
BAYOU SUNLNG9911537Oil tanker6.5 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−37%11.13,356 t€102k
ORIENT INNOVATION9793387Oil tanker6.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−38%12.12,384 t€71k
SOLAR MADELEIN9882413Oil tanker6.2 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−41%12.12,419 t€71k

30 of 28 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.