Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Zodiac Maritime Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 79 |
| CO₂ emitted | 1.3 Mt+26.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 164 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 4 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Zodiac Maritime Ltd8.3 (−49% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | 20 | 8.3 | −49% | 238 | 13.9 | 3,576 | 1.8% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Zodiac Maritime Ltd6.7 (−16% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | 24 | 6.7 | −16% | 157 | 10.3 | 2,477 | 9.5% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- Zodiac Maritime Ltd47.1 (−15% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | 12 | 47.1 | −15% | 97 | 14.7 | 2,372 | 3.5% | 3 |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Zodiac Maritime Ltd14.3 (−5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | 12 | 14.3 | −5% | 65 | 11.7 | 2,245 | 3.7% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- Zodiac Maritime Ltd14.5 (−59% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | 6 | 14.5 | −59% | 104 | 12.0 | 2,160 | 5.4% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Zodiac Maritime Ltd4.5 (−44% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | 4 | 4.5 | −44% | 131 | 10.2 | 3,310 | 1.9% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- Zodiac Maritime Ltd46.1 (−52% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | 1 | 46.1 | −52% | 89 | 14.4 | 4,674 | 4.8% | 1 |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Maritime Ltd | ABS (79) | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Zodiac Maritime Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOLD XING | 9308807 | Vehicle carrier | 274 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +73% | 14.1 | 12,412 t | €336k |
| LEO SUN | 9457608 | Oil tanker | 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +65% | 5.5 | 1,498 t | €43k |
| RUBY TOWER | 9618276 | Container | 16.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +64% | 14.1 | 17,351 t | €0 |
| CELESTE NOVA | 9534054 | Oil tanker | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +46% | 9.5 | 10,716 t | €353k |
| WHITE MOON | 9588158 | Oil tanker | 6.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +38% | 10.0 | 10,643 t | €315k |
| EMERALD TOWER | 9618288 | Container | 14.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +38% | 15.7 | 23,203 t | €0 |
| HAI SHANG | 9792852 | Oil tanker | 10.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +27% | 10.0 | 13,501 t | €326k |
| AZURE NOVA | 9602631 | Oil tanker | 5.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +23% | 11.8 | 25,205 t | €700k |
| SAPPHIRE TOWER | 9618290 | Container | 12.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +23% | 15.1 | 42,917 t | €0 |
| DONINGTON | 9748291 | Vehicle carrier | 40.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +15% | 12.9 | 11,403 t | €335k |
| MAERSK CANYON | 9924235 | Container | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +14% | 16.1 | 78,669 t | €2.1m |
| THRUXTON | 9782089 | Vehicle carrier | 48.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | +12% | 16.3 | 20,632 t | €635k |
| BRIGHTON | 9332846 | Container | 15.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +10% | 9.8 | 24,227 t | €736k |
| BLUE NOVA | 9534846 | Oil tanker | 5.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +9% | 10.8 | 27,640 t | €818k |
| HAIFENG | 9792840 | Oil tanker | 8.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +6% | 11.5 | 13,056 t | €389k |
| CANAL STREET | 9539561 | Oil tanker | 11.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +6% | 11.5 | 6,155 t | €231k |
| MAERSK CAMBRIDGE | 9924182 | Container | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +4% | 16.1 | 77,704 t | €2.1m |
| LYDDEN | 9782091 | Vehicle carrier | 79.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | +4% | 13.5 | 9,939 t | €274k |
| RICHMOND PARK | 9624782 | Chemical tanker | 15.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +4% | 11.8 | 9,926 t | €277k |
| SAIC ANJI ETERNITY | 9955040 | Vehicle carrier | 36.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +4% | 16.0 | 4,316 t | €118k |
| BROOKLANDS | 9748289 | Vehicle carrier | 56.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +2% | 15.2 | 11,625 t | €311k |
| SOHO SQUARE | 9505819 | Oil tanker | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +1% | 10.4 | 20,577 t | €581k |
| BERKELEY SQUARE | 1027914 | Oil tanker | 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +1% | 8.4 | 2,690 t | €85k |
| DORSET | 9470088 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 14.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +1% | 7.2 | 3,527 t | €96k |
| RED MOON | 9590307 | Oil tanker | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | 0% | 9.9 | 16,677 t | €478k |
| HYDE PARK | 9725861 | Chemical tanker | 15.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | 0% | 11.8 | 6,502 t | €189k |
| ZENITH LUMOS | 9864215 | Container | 7.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −2% | 11.7 | 27,968 t | €803k |
| ZEAL LUMOS | 9864241 | Container | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −3% | 13.0 | 39,578 t | €1.1m |
| MAERSK CAMPTON | 9924211 | Container | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −3% | 15.4 | 58,612 t | €1.6m |
| GEMINI SUN | 9343340 | Oil tanker | 8.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −3% | 10.2 | 13,363 t | €400k |
30 of 79 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.