Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Kumiai Navigation (Pte) Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Kumiai Navigation (Pte) Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 39 kt+9.3% |
| Fuel per mile | 104 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Kumiai Navigation (Pte) Ltd6.3 (−20% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumiai Navigation (Pte) Ltd | 4 | 6.3 | −20% | 103 | 10.7 | 3,362 | 1.9% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- Kumiai Navigation (Pte) Ltd16.6 (−53% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumiai Navigation (Pte) Ltd | 1 | 16.6 | −53% | 121 | 14.8 | 728 | 4.2% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
Kumiai Navigation (Pte) Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KN BLOSSOM | 9906300 | Bulk carrier | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +30% | 10.5 | 15,685 t | €425k |
| CRYSTAL ANGEL | 9833199 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 16.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +15% | 14.8 | 4,062 t | €112k |
| KN FOREST | 9558268 | Bulk carrier | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +1% | 11.0 | 10,127 t | €304k |
| CAPE LILY | 9612430 | Bulk carrier | 3.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −26% | 10.5 | 8,805 t | €234k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.