Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- OSM Ship Management Pte Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| OSM Ship Management Pte Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 4 |
| CO₂ emitted | 41 kt+133.5% |
| Fuel per mile | 73 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Vehicle carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- OSM Ship Management Pte Ltd236 (+326% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Ship Management Pte Ltd | 3 | 236 | +326% | 59 | 11.9 | 3,567 | 3.9% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- OSM Ship Management Pte Ltd121 (+27% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Ship Management Pte Ltd | 1 | 121 | +27% | 106 | 12.3 | 4,114 | 6.6% | – |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Ship Management Pte Ltd | DNV (3), China Classification Society (1) | 25% | 100% | 100% | 0% |
OSM Ship Management Pte Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLARIS PRINCESS | 9136967 | Vehicle carrier | 255 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +61% | 11.8 | 8,861 t | €320k |
| POLARIS LIBERTY | 9407689 | Vehicle carrier | 236 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +49% | 12.0 | 14,517 t | €698k |
| ANJI FLOURISHMENT | 1038602 | Vehicle carrier | 107 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | +41% | 12.0 | 593 t | €24k |
| ASTURIAS | 9481049 | Ro-ro | 121 g CO₂/t·nm | 100 | +21% | 12.3 | 16,631 t | €522k |
30 of 4 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.