Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

POS SM Co Ltd
Ships28
CO₂ emitted214 kt+21.2%
Fuel per mile125 kg/nm
Average speed12.2 kn
CO₂ at berth2.7%
Ships burning LNG5
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1

  • POS SM Co Ltd5.1 (−29%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
POS SM Co Ltd55.1−29%17614.52,7961.3%5
Segment median 7.10%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • POS SM Co Ltd10.1 (−60%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
POS SM Co Ltd910.1−60%9411.11,6533.5%–
Segment median 25.50%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • POS SM Co Ltd5.9 (−26%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
POS SM Co Ltd105.9−26%8411.01,3793.1%–
Segment median 7.90%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • POS SM Co Ltd1.5 (−81%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
POS SM Co Ltd21.5−81%23611.157011.8%–
Segment median 8.00%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • POS SM Co Ltd24.6 (+64%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
POS SM Co Ltd124.6+64%9311.21,1505.9%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
POS SM Co LtdKorean Register (28)4%96%21%0%

POS SM Co Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
PAN QUEEN9487419Bulk carrier29.8 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+92%11.75,176 t€151k
ROBUSTA9824992General cargo45.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+80%10.71,625 t€47k
PAN FLOWER9625841Bulk carrier9.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+24%10.74,066 t€128k
GRAND ACE69375329Chemical tanker24.6 g CO₂/t·nm21.4+15%11.23,753 t€123k
PAN CONCORD9966855Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−1%11.48,087 t€215k
PAN ORION9855848Bulk carrier9.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−1%10.43,686 t€134k
PAN SAPPHIRE9860386Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−1%12.21,496 t€42k
PAN IMPERIAL9699361Bulk carrier7.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−3%10.72,774 t€78k
PAN HARVEST9699335Bulk carrier5.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−11%11.13,567 t€108k
PAN REGINA9875666Bulk carrier5.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−19%10.75,348 t€176k
AL QA'IYYAHLNG9976812LNG carrier5.4 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−24%14.023,061 t€612k
NEW APEXLNG9929106LNG carrier5.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−26%14.222,961 t€608k
UMM SWAYYAHLNG9976915LNG carrier5.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−29%15.523,972 t€635k
NEW NATURELNG9926910LNG carrier5.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−29%13.917,813 t€475k
NEW GREENLNG9947500LNG carrier5.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−30%15.19,728 t€260k
ARBORELLA9613288General cargo17.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−33%11.55,481 t€138k
BRASSIANA9613290General cargo14.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−41%11.58,965 t€260k
PAN NAVIGATOR9805685Bulk carrier2.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−49%10.01,713 t€46k
HALOPHYLA9613329General cargo11.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−56%11.48,309 t€245k
DELICATA9613317General cargo10.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−60%11.56,096 t€184k
SALIGNA9825001General cargo8.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−65%11.53,004 t€87k
GRAND AMBITION9909807Oil tanker1.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−66%11.14,693 t€149k
UROPHYLLA9825013General cargo8.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−67%11.25,394 t€155k
GRANDIS9824980General cargo6.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−73%10.56,943 t€193k
DUNNII9824978General cargo3.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−85%10.32,740 t€73k

30 of 28 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.