Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Atlas Maritime Shipmanagement Ltd
Ships8
CO₂ emitted54 kt+418.2%
Fuel per mile120 kg/nm
Average speed11.7 kn
CO₂ at berth7.6%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Atlas Maritime Shipmanagement Ltd5.0 (−37%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Atlas Maritime Shipmanagement Ltd65.0−37%12511.11,7318.0%–
Segment median 8.00%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4

  • Atlas Maritime Shipmanagement Ltd63.9 (+16%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Atlas Maritime Shipmanagement Ltd263.9+16%10315.08625.2%–
Segment median 55.40%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Atlas Maritime Shipmanagement LtdABS (8)100%0%0%0%

Atlas Maritime Shipmanagement Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
UGR ZAKHER9980411Vehicle carrier77.5 g CO₂/t·nm76.1+2%14.72,133 t€70k
COPENHAGEN STAR9995985Oil tanker7.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−4%10.06,523 t€200k
FREEPORT STAR9933212Oil tanker6.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−5%10.110,376 t€299k
UGR AL SAMHA9973444Vehicle carrier50.4 g CO₂/t·nm55.4−9%15.26,213 t€178k
STAVANGER STAR9984871Oil tanker5.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−11%12.217,324 t€531k
GENEVA STAR1028528Oil tanker3.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−17%10.42,007 t€57k
OSLO STAR9984883Oil tanker4.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−30%10.77,214 t€201k
LAUSANNE STAR1028530Oil tanker2.6 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−43%12.31,798 t€47k

30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.