Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

MMS
Ships49
CO₂ emitted374 kt
Fuel per mile118 kg/nm
Average speed12.2 kn
CO₂ at berth3.0%
Ships burning LNG2
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

  • MMS10.1 (−42%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS410.1−42%23315.32,7281.2%–
Segment median 17.50%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • MMS6.3 (−22%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS196.3−22%8611.01,7883.1%–
Segment median 8.10%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • MMS7.5 (−7%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS177.5−7%9711.21,7825.2%2
Segment median 8.10%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3

  • MMS53.4 (−4%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS553.4−4%11415.61,8103.4%–
Segment median 55.30%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8

  • MMS17.4 (−51%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS117.4−51%11612.61,5872.6%–
Segment median 35.80%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • MMS13.9 (−17%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MMS313.9−17%6512.07782.4%–
Segment median 16.70%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MMSDNV (47), ClassNK (2)96%8%4%0%

MMS: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
GINGA KITE9228291Chemical tanker85.2 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+107%10.4763 t€13k
MORNING CLARA9460887Vehicle carrier67.4 g CO₂/t·nm38.0+77%3.353 t€825
BW TOKYO9398307Gas carrier (LPG)17.4 g CO₂/t·nm15.0+16%12.67,304 t€114k
LADY ANNE9866184Bulk carrier7.5 g CO₂/t·nm6.7+13%10.96,143 t€97k
ULTRA VISION9878694Bulk carrier10.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+11%12.02,890 t€46k
NORD AGANO9893266Bulk carrier5.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+7%10.19,937 t€151k
ZAMPA BLUE9454163Bulk carrier5.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+3%10.49,057 t€187k
NORD TOPAZ9992268Bulk carrier10.0 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+2%9.32,653 t€42k
ONE OLYMPUS9312987Container10.9 g CO₂/t·nm10.7+1%15.638,737 t€608k
THEBEN9722302Vehicle carrier38.4 g CO₂/t·nm38.0+1%15.319,358 t€309k
THEMIS9722314Vehicle carrier37.7 g CO₂/t·nm38.0−1%14.914,378 t€250k
LOWLANDS DIAMOND9965617Bulk carrier9.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.7−2%11.33,157 t€54k
CAPRICORN SIGMA9747962Bulk carrier4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.9−2%10.33,739 t€57k
ANDEAN SUNLNG9911525Oil tanker9.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−3%11.311,890 t€209k
NYK VIRGO9312810Container10.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−3%15.438,695 t€608k
PROGRESS ACE9267687Vehicle carrier53.4 g CO₂/t·nm55.3−4%16.69,905 t€158k
AFRICAN DRAGON9990416Bulk carrier4.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.9−5%10.65,721 t€92k
ESTEEM DISCOVERY9882358Oil tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−5%11.94,755 t€86k
ORANGE HARMONY9764099Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.7−6%12.214,115 t€233k
PARADISE ACE9293648Vehicle carrier69.0 g CO₂/t·nm73.3−6%17.26,533 t€113k
MAERSK STADELHORN9726671Container9.9 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−7%15.513,788 t€208k
ORANGE FRIENDSHIP9941350Bulk carrier7.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.1−9%11.97,292 t€116k
HAFNIA SHANGHAI9830290Oil tanker8.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−12%10.67,194 t€117k
GINGA MERLIN9254252Chemical tanker13.9 g CO₂/t·nm16.5−16%12.22,606 t€40k
IVS WINDSOR9774458Bulk carrier6.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.1−16%10.92,835 t€54k
FEDERAL PASSION9926049Bulk carrier8.2 g CO₂/t·nm9.7−16%10.42,123 t€36k
PAVO BRAVE9894480Bulk carrier5.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.7−16%12.04,569 t€76k
GINGA HAWK9222651Chemical tanker13.7 g CO₂/t·nm16.5−17%12.52,401 t€43k
ARIES KARIN9894478Bulk carrier4.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.9−17%10.01,793 t€28k
ONE ORPHEUS9313008Container8.7 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−19%14.930,222 t€479k

30 of 49 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.