Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Maerskyour view
- CMA CGM
- Hapag-Lloyd AG
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Maersk | CMA CGM | Hapag-Lloyd AG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships | 182 | 198 | 63 |
| CO₂ emitted | 6.7 Mt−2.2% | 4.8 Mt−12.8% | 2.1 Mt+105.9% |
| Fuel per mile | 223 kg/nm | 211 kg/nm | 280 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.7 kn | 12.3 kn | 15.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 1.3% | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 4 | 29 | 12 |
| Main segment | Container | Container | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Maersk10.6 (−35% vs median)
- CMA CGM14.0 (−14% vs median)
- Hapag-Lloyd AG7.6 (−53% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maersk | 179 | 10.6 | −35% | 223 | 14.7 | 3,741 | 1.3% | 4 |
| CMA CGM | 196 | 14.0 | −14% | 213 | 12.3 | 2,962 | 4.3% | 29 |
| Hapag-Lloyd AG | 63 | 7.6 | −53% | 280 | 15.6 | 3,654 | 1.9% | 12 |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Con-ro
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 9.9
- CMA CGM23.7 (+139% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA CGM | 2 | 23.7 | +139% | 66 | 11.0 | 3,703 | 14.2% | – |
| Segment median | 9.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maersk | ABS (179), Lloyd's Register (3) | 1% | 1% | 100% | 0% |
| CMA CGM | ABS (196), EnvService (2) | 2% | 0% | 97% | 0% |
| Hapag-Lloyd AG | DNV (63) | 2% | 100% | 95% | 0% |
Maersk: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAERSK MONTE LINZOR | 9283186 | Container | 23.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +62% | 14.2 | 8,810 t | €265k |
| EUGEN MAERSK | 9321550 | Container | 9.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +37% | 15.4 | 74,438 t | €2.0m |
| MAERSK BROWNSVILLE | 9313955 | Container | 19.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +35% | 12.7 | 27,914 t | €735k |
| MAERSK NEWBURY | 9231470 | Container | 29.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +31% | 12.2 | 14,794 t | €500k |
| EMMA MAERSK | 9321483 | Container | 9.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +31% | 15.8 | 95,176 t | €2.6m |
| ELEONORA MAERSK | 9321500 | Container | 9.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +29% | 16.0 | 79,329 t | €2.1m |
| EDITH MAERSK | 9321548 | Container | 9.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +28% | 16.0 | 84,322 t | €2.1m |
| SANTA ISABEL MAERSK | 9444728 | Container | 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +28% | 14.2 | 40,271 t | €1.1m |
| MAYVIEW MAERSK | 9619995 | Container | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +27% | 15.5 | 48,121 t | €1.4m |
| MONTE TAMARO | 9357949 | Container | 18.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +26% | 14.6 | 10,870 t | €314k |
| MAERSK OHIO | 9298698 | Container | 18.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +25% | 14.9 | 39,176 t | €992k |
| MAERSK NEWCASTLE | 9215878 | Container | 27.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +25% | 8.0 | 13,385 t | €599k |
| MAERSK MONTANA | 9305312 | Container | 17.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +23% | 15.2 | 40,786 t | €1.0m |
| SANTA CLARA MAERSK | 9444716 | Container | 17.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +22% | 14.3 | 38,918 t | €1.0m |
| ELLY MAERSK | 9321536 | Container | 8.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +22% | 15.4 | 70,745 t | €2.0m |
| MAERSK MONTE PASCOAL | 9283203 | Container | 17.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +21% | 15.8 | 25,658 t | €711k |
| MAERSK KANSAS | 9311701 | Container | 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +19% | 15.3 | 39,703 t | €982k |
| EVELYN MAERSK | 9321512 | Container | 8.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +18% | 16.8 | 78,589 t | €2.1m |
| ESTELLE MAERSK | 9321495 | Container | 8.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +18% | 16.3 | 67,813 t | €1.7m |
| SANTA CATARINA | 9444730 | Container | 16.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +17% | 14.7 | 27,963 t | €746k |
| MAERSK IOWA | 9298686 | Container | 16.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +15% | 15.3 | 33,437 t | €840k |
| MAERSK DENVER | 9332999 | Container | 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +15% | 17.0 | 4,300 t | €113k |
| SANTA URSULA | 9430387 | Container | 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +15% | 17.1 | 31,211 t | €924k |
| MAERSK MONTE ROSA | 9283215 | Container | 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +12% | 12.8 | 13,603 t | €359k |
| MAERSK SELETAR | 9315197 | Container | 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +12% | 16.3 | 5,409 t | €142k |
| MAERSK NAKURU | 9356103 | Container | 24.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +11% | 10.9 | 7,286 t | €329k |
| MAERSK HORSBURGH | 9784269 | Container | 7.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +10% | 15.9 | 60,488 t | €1.6m |
| MAERSK MONTE OLIVIA | 9283198 | Container | 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +8% | 14.9 | 10,113 t | €275k |
| MAERSK MONTE ALTO | 9283227 | Container | 15.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +8% | 14.7 | 27,858 t | €736k |
| MAERSK TUKANG | 9334686 | Container | 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +7% | 16.4 | 58,410 t | €1.5m |
30 of 182 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.