Navalyze

Navalyze · Flags · Japan

Japan flag, 2025

Ships whose port of registry belongs to Japan, as estimated from the THETIS-MRV reports for 2025, and the companies operating them. Each company counts only its ships under this flag.

?
?

At a glance

Ships
78
12 with a blank port, flag from another year
Emitted
754,926 t
CO₂, all ships under the flag
EU ETS allowances due
€18.5m
247,180 t of allowances at the chosen price
Largest operator: NYK
€4.1m
21 ships, 22% of the flag's allowances

Ship types under this flag

CO₂ by segment.

  • Vehicle carrier300,078 t
  • Container292,970 t
  • Bulk carrier84,973 t
  • LNG carrier42,770 t
  • Chemical tanker28,932 t
  • Gas carrier (LPG)2,598 t
  • Other1,946 t
  • Reefer545 t
  • Ro-ro114 t

Companies by EU ETS cost

The 19 operators with most EU ETS allowances due for their Japan-flagged ships in 2025. Companies of one group are summed, as on the compare page; their ships under other flags are not counted here.

#OperatorMain segmentShipsunder JapanCO₂emitted, totalAllowancesEU ETS costvs segment medianlower is bettervs similar-size shipssame segment, lower is better
1NYK(3 companies)Vehicle carrier21137,701 t€4.1m−24%−14%
2MOL(5 companies)Vehicle carrier17147,033 t€3.4m+12%−6%
3ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTDContainer7162,141 t€2.6m−39%−27%
4Bernhard SchulteContainer277,558 t€2.2m––
5K Line(2 companies)Vehicle carrier864,270 t€1.8m−20%+2%
6NS United Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd.Bulk carrier143,277 t€1.1m––
7Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd.Container130,722 t€1.0m––
8Toko Unyu Co LtdVehicle carrier317,468 t€486k––
9ASAHI SHIPPING CO., LTD.Bulk carrier215,478 t€426k––
10EXCEL MARINE CO., LTD.Vehicle carrier214,546 t€406k––
11HACHIUMA STEAMSHIP CO.,LTD.Vehicle carrier412,498 t€334k––
12MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.Vehicle carrier28,068 t€212k––
13Sugahara Kisen Co.,LtdVehicle carrier15,619 t€154k––
14MIZUHO SANGYO CO., LTD.Bulk carrier14,583 t€120k––
15MAGSAYSAY MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.Bulk carrier13,981 t€106k––
16KITAURA KAIUN CO., LTD.Other11,946 t€54k––
17MISUGA KAIUN CO., LTD.Bulk carrier27,490 t€45k––
18TOEI REEFER LINE LTD.Reefer1545 t€23k––
19UNIVERSAL MARINE CORPORATIONBulk carrier10 t€0––
Show by ISM company (DoC holder) instead of group
#OperatorMain segmentShipsunder JapanCO₂emitted, totalAllowancesEU ETS costvs segment medianlower is bettervs similar-size shipssame segment, lower is better
1NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTDVehicle carrier19127,183 t€3.8m−24%−14%
2ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTDContainer7162,141 t€2.6m−39%−27%
3BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIPContainer277,558 t€2.2m––
4MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Vehicle carrier853,102 t€1.5m+46%+6%
5"K" Line RoRo Bulk Ship Management Co., Ltd.Vehicle carrier653,067 t€1.5m−18%+4%
6NS United Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd.Bulk carrier143,277 t€1.1m––
7Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd.Container130,722 t€1.0m––
8MOL Ship Management Co., Ltd.Vehicle carrier331,156 t€833k––
9MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.LNG carrier122,001 t€592k––
10Toko Unyu Co LtdVehicle carrier317,468 t€486k––
11ASAHI SHIPPING CO., LTD.Bulk carrier215,478 t€426k––
12EXCEL MARINE CO., LTD.Vehicle carrier214,546 t€406k––
13MOL Tankship Management Pte. Ltd.Chemical tanker111,829 t€386k––
14HACHIUMA STEAMSHIP CO.,LTD.Vehicle carrier412,498 t€334k––
15Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, LtdVehicle carrier211,203 t€278k––
16NYK LNG Shipmanagement LtdLNG carrier17,921 t€213k––
17MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.Vehicle carrier28,068 t€212k––
18Sugahara Kisen Co.,LtdVehicle carrier15,619 t€154k––
19MIZUHO SANGYO CO., LTD.Bulk carrier14,583 t€120k––
20MAGSAYSAY MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.Bulk carrier13,981 t€106k––
21MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.Chemical tanker428,945 t€83k––
22NYK Energy Ocean Shipmanagement Pte LtdGas carrier (LPG)12,598 t€81k––
23KITAURA KAIUN CO., LTD.Other11,946 t€54k––
24MISUGA KAIUN CO., LTD.Bulk carrier27,490 t€45k––
25TOEI REEFER LINE LTD.Reefer1545 t€23k––
26UNIVERSAL MARINE CORPORATIONBulk carrier10 t€0––
Allowances
:
EU ETS allowances due for the year, at the chosen price.
vs segment median
:
CO₂ per transport work against the median segment ship. Below 0% is better.
vs similar-size ships
:
CO₂ per transport work of the median ship, against the median ship of the same size band in its segment (whole segment where the segment has no size bands). Below 0% is better.

EU ETS allowances are not a tax: companies buy and surrender one allowance per tonne of CO₂ in scope. Figures use the 2025 phase-in share and an EUA price of €75 per tonne, which the commercial view lets you change. The flag is estimated from the port of registry; see the Flags page.